Panikos Hrisanthu provided important insights regarding Sevgül Uludağ’s work on the relationship between humanity and politics. Hrisanthu noted that Uludağ’s comprehensive studies on missing persons have played a pioneering role in societal terms. Sevgül focused on reflecting the pain of both sides, not just her own community, in her work.
While addressing human emotions, Uludağ’s work gradually acquired a strong political dimension, emphasizing that one of the most crucial elements of politics should be humanity-centered. The essence of poli…ng should prioritize human life, safety, and well-being. This fundamental principle is at the core of Sevgül’s work.
Pioneering and Revolutionary Work
Hrisanthu also highlighted Uludağ’s courage and goal-oriented approach in investigating the fate of missing persons. Uludağ’s endeavors to uncover the fates of the missing have been carried out with a profound sense of responsibility within society, focusing on the practical aspects of finding and burying the remains of the missing. In this process, she has acted as a bridge to understand and share the pain of both sides.
By expanding her research beyond her own community, Uludağ has managed to earn the trust of both sides and reflect the sorrows of the people. This situation exemplifies her bravery and dedication, providing some solace to the families of the lost.
Political Barriers and Courage
When Sevgül Uludağ began her work on missing persons, she faced opposition from Rauf Denktaş, the leader of Turkish Cypriot politics at the time. Denktaş rejected the idea of conducting studies to investigate the fate of the missing, which led Uludağ into considerable trouble as he did not want any discussion regarding the existence of the missing individuals.
Hrisanthu emphasized Uludağ’s courage and conviction by stating, “Sevgül was targeted by both Turkish Cypriots and Greek Cypriots, yet this did not stop her.” In her writings, she not only provided information on where the missing might be but also argued for the necessity of greater transparency on this issue.
According to Hrisanthu, Uludağ’s work is not merely a written history for society; it serves as a lesson for humanity. He pointed out that the community must acknowledge its own responsibilities in this context, as covering up past crimes can pave the way for new offenses.
The fact that Sevgül Uludağ’s funeral turned into a collective mourning event for both Turkish and Greek Cypriots illustrates how her personality was embraced by all. The shared sentiment of grief is a part of her legacy. The courage and efforts of Uludağ now challenge the community to initiate a formation regarding loss and suffering both now and in the future.
Source: www.yeniduzen.com
